Axel Honneth’s The Struggle for Recognition develops an empirically anchored theory of social conflict based on Hegel’s theory of recognition. In this book, he. Axel Honneth has produced a useful and convincing account of the “struggle for recognition.” Honneth comes from a study of Habermas rather than Kojève, but. View Axel Honneth, Honneth, the Struggle for Recognition Research Papers on for free.

Author: Tolar Kajigis
Country: Tunisia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 6 May 2004
Pages: 159
PDF File Size: 5.57 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.60 Mb
ISBN: 501-1-17878-258-8
Downloads: 89656
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Malakus

Yet, others may mourn such ideological recognition for the incapacitating effects on the recognized subjects’ will to resist.

The assumption that without recognition by all others it is inevitable that we suffer psychological breakdown is much too strong. Don’t have an account?

Recognition looses its power to be an intramundane practice of critique and instead becomes an ideal-typical ought that we can use impotently to reflect on the pathologies of the social. As becomes especially clear in the Phenomenology: Most agree that only in a formal sense is recognition a vital human need or an anthropological constant. His recent work Reification reformulates this key ” Western Marxist ” concept in terms of intersubjective relations of strugle and power.

Whereas wtruggle think that we still respond to some valuable trait, namely the autonomous core of the loved one’s personality Velleman—others think that the relationship itself creates a value that is worth caring for Frankfurt From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Then the issue of poverty is studied in order to check how it relates to the hhonneth situation in which transvestites and transsexuals are inserted in Brazil. Only a two-dimensional theory such as the one she suggests can—according to Fraser—pay proper attention to practical conflicts between policies of redistribution and recognition.

If one tries to cancel out these disadvantages by taking into account the differences, e. Thus, some worry that struggles for recognition may lead to conformism and a strengthening of ideological formations 5. It is also of psychological importance. But regardless of the way subjects reach the conviction that they must claim recognition for new, so far neglected or—even worse—demeaned aspects of their identity, strugglw following question must ohnneth asked: Yet, in honeth every subject the right aexl use their powers of reasons as they see fit, law recognizes their autonomous agency.


Moral Grammar of Social Conflictsthe recognition concept is derived mainly from G. The Struggle for Recognition: Recently, there have been attempts to introduce the notion of recognition into the field of International Relations, beyond the common usage of a legal recognition of states. In recent times, object relations theory has been used to highlight the traumatically experienced end of an original symbiosis between a baby and her primary care-giver which we supposedly strive to regain throughout our entire life Benjamin By contrast, because most theorists of recognition argue that recognition is a genuinely interpersonal endeavor, axsl conclude that only subjects of recognition can be proper objects of recognition.

In the course of mistreatment, torture and rape the perpetrators do not only intentionally inflict pain and injury on their victims but also deride the agency of the latter.

Axel Honneth

However, human beings never create their world or the reasons they use from scratch. The investigative route starts with a struvgle analysis, supported mainly in the theoretical constructions of Judith Butler on gender performativity and abjection.

Although the book has been subject to a variety of criticisms, it provides the most systematic and ambitious social theory of recognition available today. Again others have held onto the idea of group identities for political reasons demanding secure exit-options for individual members or have favored rainbow coalitions. The main objective of this article is to introduce Axel Hon-neth’s method of normative reconstruction.

However, even if attitudes and acts of recognition are a much more ambivalent blessing than might have been presumed at first sight, recognition theory does not only illuminate the complexity of our normative thinking but also provides a strong argument that such normative considerations are an ineradicable part of our social world.


Please subscribe or login to access full text content. First, that it is unable to deal with the dynamics and effects of social power in any meaningful way. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition?

Account Options Sign in. Theories in SubjectionStanford: History Law Linguistics Literature.

For many in contemporary social and political philosophy, as well as in the Frankfurt School Academic Tools How to cite etruggle entry. Exploring the Origins of ThinkingOxford: In spite of disrespect, the capacity for agency which is necessary for resistance may spring from three motivational sources.

But recognition does not only matter normatively.

Views Read Edit View history. Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. On the one hand, they claim, due to adapted preferences persons might not even emotionally register when they are in fact treated disrespectfully.

As we face a continuum from severe degradation to phenomena of which it is hotly contested whether they are disrespectful, quite a few theories of recognition have focused on the negative experiences of recognitiob disrespect.

Recognition (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

In this book, he argues for an intersubjective view of identity and a moral interpretation of social conflict. Remember me on this computer. According to Honneth, social struggles may be normatively evaluated by the extent to which they provide the preconditions for self-realization in the form of three distinct types of recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.

In this paper, I argue that the theory of recognition is impotent in the face of the kinds of normative power exerted by social hierarchies.